The Government of India Act 1935 - A Detailed Lecture

Thu, 02/28/2013 - 20:43 -- Umar Farooq

Introduction to the Government of India Act 1935

After the release and publication of Simon Commission Report when the new Labour Government succeeded in office, it declared that the Report was not final and in order to resolve the constitutional deadlock, the matter would finally considered after consulting representatives of all the Indian communities. This would be done at a Round Table Conference in London. After holding three sessions of Round Table Conference in 1930, 1931 and 1932 respectively, their recommendations were embodied in a White Paper published in 1933, which was considered by a Joint Select Committee of the British Parliament. The government also constituted a committee of 20 representatives from British .India and 7 from Indian States including 5 Muslims. The committee went in session from April 1933 to December 1934 for deliberation and submitted its report to Parliament in the end of 1934. The Parliament debated the report and passed a bill in February 1935, which got royal assent on July 24th 1935, and it was enforced on April 1" 1937 with the name of Government of India Act 1935.

Salient Features of Govt of India Act 1935

The Government of India Act 1935 contained 32 Sections 14 Parts and 10 Schedules and consisted of 2 Major Parts. The Act introduced federal system in the centre. Its salient features are as follows:

Creation of Two New Provinces

The Act provided for the creation of two new provinces of Sindh and Orissa. The new provinces together with the NWFP formed the Governor provinces making 11 in all.

Introduction of Provincial Autonomy

In the provinces Diarchy was abolished. There was no Reserve Subjects and no Executive Council in the provinces. The Council of Ministers was to administer all the provincial subjects except in certain matters like law and orders etc. for which the government had special responsibilities. The ministers were chosen from among the elected members of the provincial legislature and were collectively responsible to it.

All India Federation

The India Act 1935 proposed to set up All Indian Federation comprising of the British Indian Provinces and Princely States. The constituent units of the Federation were 11 Governor's provinces, 6 Chief Commissioner's provinces and all those states that agreed to joint it. The States were absolutely free to join or not to join the proposed Federation. At the time of joining the Federation the ruler of the state was to execute an Instrument of Accession in favour of the Crown. On acceptance of that Instrument, the state was become a unit of the Federation. The ruler was however authorized to extend the functions of the federal authority in respect of his state by executing another instrument in its internal affairs.

Division of Federal Subjects

The scheme of federation and the provincial autonomy necessitated proper division of subjects between the centre and the provinces. The division under 1919 Act was revised and the 1935 Act contained three lists i.e. Federal, Provincial and Concurrent Legislative Lists.

Introduction of Dyarchy at the Centre

The India Act 1935 introduced Dyarchy at the centre. The Federal Subjects were divided into two categories, the Reserved and the Transferred. The former included defence, ecclesiastical affairs, external affairs and administration of Tribal Areas. These were to be administered by the Governor General with the help of executive councilors not exceeding three in number. The rest of the subjects were Transferred ones. These were to be administered by the Governor General with the help of a Council of Ministers, the number of which was not to exceed 10. The ministers were 10 he responsible to Governor General and the legislature. The Governor General by his special powers and responsibilities could dominate the ministers.

Protection of Minorities


Related pages


social ills examplesmicromarketing definitionricardo theory of rentdefinition of exogamyjurisprudence lecture notescontagious magic definitionmarketing targeting and positioningdiscuss the law of diminishing marginal utilityconflict meanindefinition of insight learningeffects of ethnocentrism4ps marketing mixjournalistic meaningwhat are characteristics of a command economycase studies disadvantageswhat is meaning of secularismdefinition of communism in economicsimportance of mixed economyweberian sociological theorydefinition of mini computerspavlov theory classical conditioningspecific meaning in hindiaristotle familymicroeconomics definition economicsego by freuddefinition of forward integrationmax weber and bureaucracydefine recessionary gapcommand socialist economyexample of closure in psychologyskimming price policy definitionpropaganda techniques transfer examplesrepublic plato sparknotesprinciples of gestalt psychology koffkacodifying lawspros of federalismhobbs theorydefine convenienceslecture method of teaching pptdefinition of nomadic peoplesuccessful sole proprietorships examplesdefinition of sole proprietormultinational organization definitioncapitalist mixed economydiminishing marginal utility definition economicsinconvenient defineid ego superego psychologyadvantages and disadvantage of partnershipdefine consumer equilibriumsir john whitmore coachingdefine caste system in sociologystages in buyer decision processsocialists meaningwhat is dissonance in communicationwhat barter meanphotojournalistic photography definitionhilda taba curriculum developmentsigmund freud 3 components of personalitynorms moreshow do transactions affect the accounting equationdefine divine right of kingssocial action by max weberexample of law of diminishing returnsdiscrimination definition sociologyadvantages and disadvantages of societal marketing conceptcodified legal systemmax weber sociology of religionindustrial goods examplesdefinition of hrm by different authorsswot analysis example applemainframe notesconstant marginal utility of moneyhistorical cost principle examplewolfgang kohler chimpanzee experimentculture lag in sociologysecondary group sociology